ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMPUTERS AND HUMANS[1]

 

The foundation of Boolean logic is based on a less complicated type of biochemistry applied to advanced computing[2].  Nanotechnology mirrors translation of DNA at the most fundamental stage[3] inasmuch as the inverter[4] is flip-flopping[5] between the two numbers in the binary code as opposed to letters in the genetic alphabet[6].  The more complex full adders[7] emulate synaptic connections in that the ripple-carry adder[8] is the unmyelinated axon[9]; therefore, 32-bit or 64-bit ripple-carry adders might take 100 to 200 nanoseconds to settle into their final sum because of carry ripple[10], which is slow.  For this reason, accordingly, more advanced engineering effects[11] the carry-lookahead adders that have myelinated sheaths on the axons that provide faster commute for nanotechnology[12] than the normal 4-bit adders.  The action potential[13][14] hence propagates quicker and settling time for the adder is much better.

One of the more interesting features of Boolean gates is that memory can be created with them.[15]  If you arrange the gates correctly, they will remember an input value.[16]  This concept is the basis of RAM[17] (random access memory) in computers[18], and also makes it possible to create a wide variety of other useful circuits[19].  Memory relies on a concept called positive feedback[20][21]; i.e.[22], the output of a gate is fed back into the input[23].  Further, if the two inputs oppose, Q’ (or Q inverse) will be zero[24]; i.e., if a paradox[25] is created, Q[26], which inherently follows S in disagreement between R and S[27], will be one and its inverse therefore false (or zero).  If the two, nonzero inputs agree, i.e., if R and S are both one, then Q’ remembers.

Suppose there are two inputs (D and E).  D can be thought of as “Data” and E as “Enable.”[28]  If E is one, then Q will follow D.  Suchlike is the verification of truth where E is the proof to the mind[29].  Otherwise, if E changes to zero, then Q will remember whatever was last seen on D[30].  Much the same in mathematics, using the trial and error method[31]: if the Supreme Mathematical Court[32] determines that the proof is incorrect, the judge will interdict the method and will rely upon previous judgments prior to the mistrial.[33]



[1] This has been selected as a title because “Raving Gibberish” seemed too vague

[2] This is because logic did not exist before advanced computing, except on the planet Vulcan.

[3] By “mirrors,” I mean, “is discussed in the same issue of Discover.”

[4] (Or NON gate) Simplest possible gate in the system of Boolean logic, akin to a cell in the body.

[5] I freely intermix concepts of boolean logic and digital circuitry here, because I misunderstand both on a fundamental level

[6] It’s important, when reading this, not to know shit about DNA except have a vague idea that there are four letters.  If you already know more than the movie “Gattica” teaches you, skip this part.

[7] I couldn’t think of a cool pseudo-intellectual term for addition, so here, I’m talking about snakes.

[8] 4-bit adder called a ripple-carry because the carry bits "ripple" from one adder to the next.

[9] By “is” I am assuming that you fundamentally misunderstand both neurochemistry and reflexive grammar

[10] Cherry ripple is equally slow to consume, inasmuch as it leads to ice cream headache.

[11] The affects/effects debate is highly affected by neurological effects

[12] Nanotechnology, in this case, is defined as something that travels along neurons, because the complexities of neurological behavior elude me.

[13] Sequential, electrochemical polarization and depolarization that travels across the membrane of a neuron in response to stimulation.

[14] I copied that right out of my sister’s biology textbook.

[15] I consider this much more interesting, than say, the ability to think rationally

[16] If you make the parts and put them together correctly, you can make a silver pocketwatch

[17] Before this concept was invented, RAM would immediately forget everything you told it

[18] RAM that appears outside of computers, like in the microwave oven or a cell phone, does not have a conceptual basis

[19] I’m certain this has not yet occurred to anybody, and I intend to patent it.

[20] Physiological return of some of the output of a system as input so as to exert some control in the process.

[21] Or, at the very least, constructive criticism

[22] “id est,” or “that is”

[23] These kinds of circuits were developed years ago and were given some kind of name that I have forgotten

[24] It takes considerable skill to make a concept even as simple as a latch circuit seem this confused.  Deal with it.

[25] I haven’t yet invented the binary paradox, but it’s important to misunderstanding the basic concepts in the following

[26] Q appears in every basic diagram of a latch circuit, as well as several Star Trek episodes

[27] I copied R and S off the diagram, too.  I don’t explain them because I’m not sure what they mean

[28] They can be thought of this way, but don’t.  They’re just letters in the alphabet.  That’s algebra.

[29] By “suchlike” I mean, of course, that you can’t possibly still be reading this. 

[30] However, if ‘E’ is showing  “Inside Hollywood,” then Q is likely to change the channel.

[31] Most math is trial and error, which you can then compare with a calculator to see if you are correct.

[32] This used to be on “Court TV” but lost in the ratings to Judge Wapner’s Animal Court.  The “trial” part of trial and error is usually litigated by mathematicians.

[33] And that, your honor, is why I should be found not guilty of traveling 45 m.p.h. in a 35 m.p.h. zone.